Monday, October 29, 2012

Lawsuit Demands Transparency Between GA Law Enforcement and ICE - Hispanically Speaking News

Lawsuit Demands Transparency Between GA Law Enforcement and ICE - Hispanically Speaking News

Lawsuit Demands Transparency Between GA Law Enforcement and ICE

Lawsuit Demands Transparency Between GA Law Enforcement and ICE
Photo: Georgia Immigration Laws
This week the Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights (GLAHR) and the ACLU of Georgia filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The suit seeks public records documenting the effects of Georgia’s increasing involvement in immigration enforcement, including information that will shed light on increasing reports of racial profiling and police abuse.

The two organizations requested the records over six months ago. With representation by the ACLU of Georgia, the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, and the NYU Immigrant Rights Clinic, the lawsuit alleges that DHS and ICE have failed to comply with the Freedom of Information Act, and demands the release of the requested records.

Azadeh Shahshahani, counsel for the ACLU of Georgia commented, “Transparency is integral to a democratic society.  Yet by withholding the records, ICE is preventing the shining of much needed light on the extent of the collaboration between this agency and local police in Georgia.”

The impact of Georgia’s experiment with immigration enforcement—through 287(g) agreements, the Secure Communities program, and HB 87—is largely unstudied. The records sought in the lawsuit will reveal who is being targeted for immigration enforcement, and how increased immigration enforcement by police is impacting public safety and civil rights.

Adelina Nicholls, Executive Director of GLAHR explained, “Immigrant communities have felt the aggression inside their own local neighborhoods since the implementation of 287(g) and the Secure Communities Program. HB87 increased the anti-immigrant climate and now overwhelming amounts of family members in our communities have been detained under minor traffic violations, as many of them are being arrested without a ‘probable cause.’ 

Throughout the state of Georgia we are organizing to keep racial profiling out of our communities and we want to be informed about the programs that we see contributing to it. We shouldn’t have to sue for transparency but if the Department of Homeland Security and ICE refuse to honor the law, we will do what it takes to shine a light on what is happening in Georgia.”

The Full complaint can be viewed here:

Friday, October 12, 2012

Dan Kowalski: Connect the Dots

Dan Kowalski: Connect the Dots

Dan Kowalski

GET UPDATES FROM Dan Kowalski
 

Connect the Dots

Posted: 10/11/2012 2:00 pm

In May 1997, a team of four U.S. Marines shot and killed an 18-year-old U.S. citizen. He was herding goats just outside the tiny town of Redford, Texas, on the Mexican border. The Marines thought he was a drug smuggler.
Last week a Border Patrol officer died in a hail of "friendly fire" on the Arizona border with Mexico, at night, in dark, rugged terrain. The officer who died apparently thought his colleagues were "armed smugglers" and opened fire. Unable to see who was shooting, his colleagues returned fire, killing the officer.
In the intervening 15 years, have we learned nothing? How many border deaths -- American-on-American shooting deaths -- will it take for us to wake up to the fact that we have militarized our border with Mexico beyond all reason?
The 1997 killing produced a $1.9 million dollar payout by the federal government to the young man's family, a report by the U.S. Marines, another report by Lamar Smith, a PBS documentary, and a movie starring Tommy Lee Jones. The shooter was not charged with a crime. The Marines withdrew from border drug patrols.
What will this latest Border Patrol shooting death produce? Another round of investigations, reports, and documentaries, no doubt. But will we change our border policies?
Researchers, journalists and border activists all conclude that while illegal border crossings are down, border deaths are up. The four horsemen of our current border apocalypse -- xenophobia, the migrants' need to work to feed their families, the profit motive that drives more border fencing, unmanned drones and private immigration jails, and a visa quota system completely out of touch with reality -- combine and conspire to make reform difficult and unlikely, at least in the short run.
For most migrants, there is no line for visas in which to wait, not even at the back. Private companies make millions building and staffing ever more immigration prisons. If a laborer can find a job in Mexico, it might bring him $5 or $6 dollars a day, versus $8 per hour in the U.S. And if racism has not vanished, 150 years after the Civil War, fear of foreigners is not likely to evaporate any time soon. These are the facts on the ground fueling border violence.
No, reform is not just around the corner. Unless... unless the families of the dead Americans, from goat herders to Border Patrol officers, connect the dots and say, "Enough!" We have become desensitized to the hundreds (now thousands) of migrants -- foreigners -- who have died in the desert trying to cross into America. Perhaps the deaths of Americans on the border will jar us, finally, from our unholy slumber.
 

Follow Dan Kowalski on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dkbib
FOLLOW POLITICS

Friday, October 5, 2012

Los Angeles Police to Revise Immigrant Detention Policy

Los Angeles Police to Revise Immigrant Detention Policy

Los Angeles to Cease Transferring Some Immigrants

LOS ANGELES — The police in this city will soon stop turning over illegal immigrants arrested for low-level crimes to federal immigration officials for deportation, Police Chief Charlie Beck announced on Thursday.
Jason Redmond/Associated Press
Charlie Beck
At a news conference, Chief Beck said he hoped to put in place a set of protocols by the start of next year, under which the Los Angeles police will no longer honor requests from federal agencies to detain illegal immigrants who are arrested for nonviolent offenses like driving without a license, illegal vending or being drunk in public unless they were part of a street gang or had a criminal record.
The announcement was the biggest and potentially most controversial step yet for Chief Beck, who has been in his post since 2009, into the highly politicized waters of immigration enforcement. Under Secure Communities, a federal program that began in 2008, local law enforcement agencies share with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials the fingerprints of everyone they arrest.
But Chief Beck said the program had impeded efforts to keep the city safe by eroding trust between the Police Department and the communities in Los Angeles.
“Community trust is extremely important to effective policing,” he said. “So it’s my intent, by issuing this change in procedures, that we gain this trust back.”
The new policy was welcomed by immigrant rights advocates, who were still stinging from Gov. Jerry Brown’s decision just a few days earlier to veto a bill, known as the Trust Act, that would have prohibited local law enforcement officials from detaining illegal immigrants for deportation if they have not been charged with serious or violent crimes.
“This is more evidence that the Secure Communities program is incredibly flawed and, from our perspective, cruel,” said Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles.
In response to Mr. Beck’s announcement, officials from Immigration and Customs Enforcement reiterated that the agency had reformed its own policies in recent years to focus resources on "criminals, recent border crossers and repeat immigration law violators."
 “The federal government alone sets these priorities and places detainers on individuals arrested on criminal charges to ensure that dangerous criminal aliens and other priority individuals are not released from prisons and jails into our communities,” said Virginia Kice, a spokeswoman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in a prepared statement.
Chief Beck said the city attorney had told him that carrying out detention requests from federal immigration officials was not mandatory and that the decision to detain a suspect was still up to the Police Department.
But the Obama administration is pushing back against officials in Cook County, Ill., who last year adopted an ordinance that sharply limited local police cooperation with federal immigration agents.
Chief Beck said the department planned in the coming months to list the offenses for which illegal immigrants will not be detained. The police commission, a civilian board, must approve the policy.
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: October 6, 2012

An article on Friday  about a plan by the police in Los Angeles to stop turning over illegal immigrants arrested for low-level crimes to federal officials for deportation included outdated information about reaction by officials from Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The officials said in a statement sent by e-mail that the I.C.E. had been reforming its own policies to focus resources on “criminals, recent border crossers and repeat immigration law violators.” It is not the case that the officials did not respond to a request for comment. (The e-mail went astray at The Times and did not reach the reporter.)

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • E-mail
  • Share

Thursday, October 4, 2012

Palm Beach County commissioners considering push for immigration detention center

Palm Beach County commissioners considering push for immigration detention center

Palm Beach County considering push for immigration detention center

County officials also dispute concerns about jail expansion

October 2, 2012|By Andy Reid, Sun Sentinel
Palm Beach County plans a renewed push to land a proposed federal immigration detention center once sought by Broward County backers, local officials said Tuesday.
Southwest Ranches in June fell out of the running for a 1,500-bed detention center planned for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Palm Beach County had been one of the past suitors for the detention center and the jobs and federal funding it could bring. Now Palm Beach County officials say that they want to try again to land the detention center, which could move into empty jail facilities near West Palm Beach or Belle Glade.
That first means reaching out to federal officials to see if they are still looking for a new South Florida site.
A shuttered county "stockade" near the South Florida Fairgrounds, an empty building at the county's newly expanded jail facility in Belle Glade and a nearby former state prison that closed last year are among the potential spaces available to housing a federal detention center.
"It's job creation," County Administrator Robert Weisman said Tuesday. "We are open to anything."
The proposed $75 million, 1,500-bed facility once envisioned in Broward would have been more than double the size of the Krome Detention Center in west Miami-Dade County.
But public backlash from neighboring communities worried about the facility's affect on property values and other concerns helped scare off the federal government from picking Southwest Ranches for the new immigration detention center.
"We should show that we are at least interested," Palm Beach County Commissioner Priscilla Taylor said.
Palm Beach County's new push to land the federal detention center comes as the county nears completion on a $160 million initial phase of a jail expansion — a project that has drawn scrutiny for cost concerns, design problems and questions about the need as jail populations decline.
County commissioners on Tuesday received an update on jail expansion construction progress. Commissioners requested the update in response to a July 8 Sun Sentinel article detailing concerns about jail project miscalculations, faulty designs and questionable construction oversight.
The Sun Sentinel also reported that about 200 fewer jail beds were in operation than before the "expansion" began.
County Facilities Development and Operations Director Audrey Wolf on Tuesday acknowledged that "certainly there have been challenges with the jail expansion project," but she said that's typical of large-scale construction projects and that concerns highlighted by the Sun Sentinel were "sensationalized."
Wolf said the work has produced a "state-of-the-art facility" that she said the county "can be proud of."
But finishing the full-scale jail facilities expansion that was once envisioned remains on hold due to the cost and the tapering off of jail populations.
The shelved work includes future renovations and expansions at the main jail facility west of West Palm Beach and the now-shuttered "stockade" jail near the county fairgrounds.